Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.



Profile: jturnbull65
Name: jturnbull65 Offline
Joined: Sunday, June 20, 2010(UTC)
Last Visit: Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:18:55 AM(UTC)
Number of Posts: 102
[0.02% of all post / 0.03 posts per day]
Thanks Given: 0 (View Thanks)
Thanks Received: 0
Thanked Posts: 0
Community Reputation Received:
View All Posts by User
Topic: Google Co-Founders’ Solution To Jobs Problem: Work Less, More Part-Time Jobs   Go to last post
Posted: Sunday, July 6, 2014 7:41:59 PM(UTC)

The "work" that he is talking about is the total national, or even global, activity. Just as he explains with his lead-in that in 100 years the US went from requiring the vast amount of work to go towards farming to now being able to accomplish it with 2% of the workforce, he is saying likewise that the work required to produce housing, security, and the more vague "opportunity for our kids" is very small. He is speaking hypothetically and ideologically, and the misinterpretation that leads to the author calling Page clueless is laughably ironic.

Topic: AMD's GPU Market Share Takes A Beating From Intel, Nvidia   Go to last post
Posted: Friday, February 21, 2014 1:40:28 PM(UTC)

@JoelH: If you change your statement to say "gaming marketshare" is affected by cryptocurrency, then that's correct. But you mentioned "desktop" (vs notebook), which doesn't differentiate between gaming or cryptocurrency.

Your point about the retailers being the beneficiary of the markup is also correct, and that's why I pointed out the situation would be more regrettable if AMD had cards unsold, such that they were actually losing out on sales.

Topic: AMD's GPU Market Share Takes A Beating From Intel, Nvidia   Go to last post
Posted: Thursday, February 20, 2014 7:14:04 PM(UTC)

First, I can't imagine market share would be calculated by ignoring channel sales as they are a large part of the shipments. That notwithstanding, I'm still unsure about the assertion that retail markup is affecting market share. Retailers are marking up the cards because demand is still present at those levels, and the product shortages in Q4 indicate they were selling all they could make. It would seem then that a production shortfall hindered market share more than pricing.

Topic: PGP Encrypted GTalk and Facebook Chat App Arrives To Secure Your Android Device   Go to last post
Posted: Monday, July 15, 2013 3:14:48 AM(UTC)

I think you meant 'unconcerned' :p

Topic: ASRock Vision 3D 252B HTPC Review   Go to last post
Posted: Monday, August 6, 2012 11:50:52 AM(UTC)

While it's true that the product's pricetag isn't unreasonable considering the cost to build something similar, I think that a large part of the customer segment that would be interested in an HTPC solution is equally interested in building it homegrown.

Nevertheless, I welcome HTPC efforts like these as each one continues to push us further towards the promise of a digital living room.

Topic: New Details Emerge On AMD's CEO Dismissal   Go to last post
Posted: Friday, January 14, 2011 1:31:35 PM(UTC)

Superb analysis, Joel... and your follow up comment is insightful enough to justify an additional opinion article so that it can be more readily read.

Topic: Matrix 5870 died! Help me decide what to do...   Go to last post
Posted: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 5:47:07 AM(UTC)

realneil wrote:

Make them replace the original card. Or they COULD just give you the next generation ASUS Matrix 6870 or 6970 for your troubles.

(you suggested this, right?)

I responded to the email asking if there are other options available, but my impression is they are pretty rigid as to what is a comparable or next level up card.  I doubt many of the newer cards get cycled into the replacement program.

realneil wrote:

BTW: what caused the original card to die? What size and kind of PSU are you using?

Not really sure the cause of death.  I'm using a Corsair HX1000; I doubt the PSU had a hand in the untimely demise.

Topic: Matrix 5870 died! Help me decide what to do...   Go to last post
Posted: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:54:42 PM(UTC)

Hey all,

With a heavy heart, I'm here to report that the ASUS Matrix 5870 that I won from the Eyefinity Contest back in June has died.  ASUS RMA has not been able to locate a replacement 5870 and has asked me if I would like to "upgrade" to the ENGTX480 or continue waiting (no timetable) for a Matrix 5870.

5870 over GTX480 pros: Eyefinity capability with the 3 monitors as part of the prize, more efficient, quieter, cooler

GTX480 over 5870 pros: ~10-15% faster, CUDA processing

Given this, my most likely scenarios would be:

1) Wait for a replacement ASUS 5870 (probably recertified): I would not have to invest any more money and I would maintain Eyefinity capability.

2) Elect for the GTX480.  Highly likely that I would spend $130 for a waterblock.  Lose 3-monitor capability.

3) Elect for the GTX480.  Place it in my work machine (represents upgrade from 4870).   Spend $300 on two GTX460s for SLI to put in the gaming rig to re-establish 3 monitor capability.

Which would you do?



Topic: Google Knows How to Retain Employees, Or At Least Try (Updated)   Go to last post
Posted: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:40:05 AM(UTC)

The holiday bonus will be larger than $1000. $1000 is the portion of the bonus that they are moving into the base salary, so it's an additional salary bump.

Topic: At Capital One, Different Browsers = Different Interest Rates   Go to last post
Posted: Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:19:30 PM(UTC)

If this is true, this is really misdirected implementation of profiling. In the example of car color, that relates directly to the property being insured, whereas a browser has a very loose and likely artificial (i.e. corporate, shared computer) coupling with the potential borrower.

I can't say I'm surprised, though... Capital One has always demonstrated bizarre marketing and research techniques. I wonder if this browser bias is also present with other banks/credit card companies.