Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline News  
#1 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 2:01:00 PM(UTC)
News


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 25,073

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)

When Google first unveiled its 1Gbit fiber Internet service last summer, it seemed unlikely that such speeds would become common anytime soon. However, there was great hope that with Google's pressure, other ISPs would be pushed towards offering their own 1Gbit services. This past April, we did see some evidence of that, with AT&T promising to roll out its own 1Gbit service in the Austin, Texas area.

Things don't stop there. It seems that some of the biggest ISPs are being seriously slow to catch onto the 1Gbit option, with Verizon charging a staggering $210 in some areas for a 300Mbit/s connection. The gotcha here is that the upload is 65Mbit/s (as someone with 0.5Mbit/s home upload, it pains me to write this). Take a look at Arvig, likely an ISP you've never heard of, but it offers a 1Gbit package for $300 per month - and the 1Gbit is bi-directional. Expensive, definitely, but that's what happens when the area being serviced has no competition.

In some places, the offerings can be even cheaper. Vermont Telephone, which services just 17.5K customers, offers gigabit packages for as low as $30 per month. In Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, has not one, but two 1Gbit competitors - OneGigabit and Shaw. To help offer people the best bang for the buck, OneGigabit focuses on condos and apartment buildings; Shaw will focus on virtually anyone as long as the area is fiber-ready.

While I'm sure Google would love to get into all of the biggest markets at once, as consumers we can at least be happy at the fact that the company spearheaded this 1Gbit movement. As we can see, things have been accelerating over the past year, and it's only likely to get better. In time, we might just consider these mega-speeds to be normal, and not so out-of-the-ordinary.

Offline MMaddox  
#2 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 2:28:49 PM(UTC)
MMaddox


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/24/2010(UTC)
Posts: 20
Location: Everett, WA

Can't wait to see speeds like that in my neighborhood.

Offline Kidbest100  
#3 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 2:48:39 PM(UTC)
Kidbest100


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/13/2012(UTC)
Posts: 348
Location: Canada

Canadian ISP's are REALLY lazy and like to sit on their butts.

We have one of the worst price / performance ratio's throughout the country compared to most modernized countries. I am definitely glad that Vancouver has finally gotten gigabit, but I think we need to roll it out much more than just that.

Offline Versifier  
#4 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 2:58:19 PM(UTC)
Versifier


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/11/2013(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Canada

The CRTC really needs to allow more foreign competition in to Canada. Decently priced Gigabit connections would be amazing. Google Fiber in Canada needs to happen... but it probably won't!

Offline RWilliams  
#5 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:23:21 PM(UTC)
RWilliams


Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/6/2012(UTC)
Posts: 644
Location: Canada

Not all Canadian ISPs are like that. Where I'm from (east coast, New Brunswick), our ISP was the first to offer DSL in all of Canada, as far as I'm aware, and in Saint John in particular, it was one of the first cities in all of Canada to offer fiber deployments. This ISP is admittedly unlike most others though... there are no bandwidth caps, which most of Canada still have (even through the same ISP, Bell).

Offline RWilliams  
#6 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 3:33:11 PM(UTC)
RWilliams


Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/6/2012(UTC)
Posts: 644
Location: Canada

It won't happen because I'm sure the CRTC is being paid-off by the likes of Rogers and Bell to keep competition out. It's disgusting. I'm of course just *assuming* things here, but I've learned to not trust either of those companies... at all.

Offline ShaneThomasFrisinger  
#7 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 4:23:20 PM(UTC)
ShaneThomasFrisinger


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/11/2013(UTC)
Posts: 40

I am glad Google decided to take the spearhead, we need to catch up to South Korea with faster speed in this country tries and decrease its dilapidated infrastructure and aims to keep itself a powerhouse.

Offline RWilliams  
#8 Posted : Sunday, July 14, 2013 5:54:59 PM(UTC)
RWilliams


Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/6/2012(UTC)
Posts: 644
Location: Canada

That reminds me of when I was in Taiwan a couple of years ago. The Internet infrastructure was so much better there than what I was used to. I was in a non-tourist town with a friend, sitting at a cafe, and with my laptop, I connected to some free open wifi spot. The connection was great, and the speeds were faster than my home Internet connection, I just couldn't believe it (I think it was 20Mbit/s).

Offline realneil  
#9 Posted : Monday, July 15, 2013 1:42:42 AM(UTC)
realneil


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Moderator, Registered
Joined: 4/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8,695
Man
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

Thanks: 2 times

I can't see Google (or any) Fiber in my area during my lifetime. We're too rural.

Offline Kidbest100  
#10 Posted : Monday, July 15, 2013 2:22:17 AM(UTC)
Kidbest100


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/13/2012(UTC)
Posts: 348
Location: Canada

Me too Realniel, I live in the sticks, as do many Canadians...

Offline FrankScrivy  
#11 Posted : Monday, July 15, 2013 10:24:06 AM(UTC)
FrankScrivy


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/11/2013(UTC)
Posts: 30

now if only gigabit would come where im at or even half the speed of gigabit i would be happy right now 2mbps is costing us 50 bucks

Offline ajm531  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, July 16, 2013 12:31:15 AM(UTC)
ajm531


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/30/2012(UTC)
Posts: 536
Location: Schertz, Texas

Dont give up hope buddy but im just sitting here waiting for it to hit san antonio. Its like right next to austin. Come on guys speed it up.

Offline Jaybk26  
#13 Posted : Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:42:05 PM(UTC)
Jaybk26


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/3/2012(UTC)
Posts: 257

When I read articles like this it just makes me sad to live in such a small, rural town.

Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.