Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline News  
#1 Posted : Monday, June 17, 2013 10:53:11 AM(UTC)
News


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 25,073

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)

Since the introduction of Intel's "Tick / Tock" model in 2007, the company has successfully released a major new architecture one year, and then a die shrink the next. Well, according to leaked documents, 2014 looks to be the first year where Intel skips a beat, as Broadwell, Haswell's original successor, has been replaced with "Haswell Refresh".

In these documents, Ivy Bridge-E is still slated to launch in Q3 of this year, which for those looking for six-core parts not two generations behind is really good to see. However, due to significant changes in the silicon, current X79 motherboards are unable to support these upcoming chips.

In Q2 2014, "Haswell Refresh" gets pushed out, alongside the Z97 and H97 chipsets. So far, this is all the information that's been revealed, so we can only speculate at this point what it's going to bring. We're confident it's not going to bring a die shrink, unless "Haswell Refresh" is Intel's disguise for Broadwell (highly unlikely as the company hasn't done anything like that in the past). The fact that new chipset will be issued leads us to believe these won't be mere speed-bumped chips, either.

While it's a little unfortunate to see the Tick phase of this current generation missed, the fact that Intel has kept so consistent since Tick / Tock's introduction is simply mind-boggling. With this delay, it can be assumed that the challenges of shrinking our CPU dies down are growing at a rapid rate. Given that, this might not be the first pushback we'll experience.

Offline realneil  
#2 Posted : Monday, June 17, 2013 3:56:11 PM(UTC)
realneil


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Moderator, Registered
Joined: 4/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8,695
Man
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

Thanks: 2 times

They're making it harder for AMD to keep up. [:)]

I like the newer, better parts and I'm glad to see it happen too.

Offline diggity0  
#3 Posted : Monday, June 17, 2013 5:20:04 PM(UTC)
Diggity0


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/21/2012(UTC)
Posts: 48

It used to be that every refresh was like Christmas morning where you couldn't wait to get your hands on the newer and faster cpu's. Now it's like, meh - so what's the latest in smartphone technology?

Offline RWilliams  
#4 Posted : Monday, June 17, 2013 5:42:02 PM(UTC)
RWilliams


Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/5/2012(UTC)
Posts: 644
Location: Canada

And I find that a bit sad... I'm a desktop guy at heart. With smartphones, a couple of years ago it felt like we were in the 80486 desktop days where each generation was so exciting... but we essentially started off slow. Every year on the smartphone side, SoCs seem to get twice as quick with each release, so it's pretty exciting. Still can't help but get a little excited for desktop improvements though, at least from an architecture perspective. It's rare nowadays when I actually feel like I "need" to upgrade, even between two generations.

Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.