Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline News  
#1 Posted : Saturday, February 9, 2013 8:26:16 AM(UTC)
News


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 25,073

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
When IBM’s Watson supercomputer proved that the meatsack we call a human brain was inferior to its robot intellect on TV’s Jeopardy, it was an entertaining parlor trick-style PR stunt to show that Watson was capable of “learning”. Now, IBM is putting Watson to use in real life by deploying it in the medical field.

According to a Forbes report, IBM has partnered with Memorial Sloan-Kettering and WellPoint to employ Watson to help doctors treat lung cancer patients. Hospitals can access Watson via the cloud or with their own small (not nearly the size of the beast we all saw on Jeopardy) server. The report notes further that Watson’s processing power has also since been increased by 240%.

IBM Watson

The idea is that Watson is able to acquire and process information in a far greater capacity than your average human doctor and can help those folks make more accurate care decisions for patients. Doctors can apparently pose a question to Watson using plain text on a tablet and have an answer in around 30 seconds.

IBM Watson Jeopardy

While this may seem either terrific or frightening depending on your trust of humans versus robots, it’s further interesting to note that Watson will be used on the insurance side of things as well, in the area of utilization management. Which means that Watson might help your doctor make you better but can also screw you out of coverage when the bill comes.
Offline realneil  
#2 Posted : Saturday, February 9, 2013 3:33:52 PM(UTC)
realneil


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Moderator, Registered
Joined: 4/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8,695
Man
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

Thanks: 2 times

"Watson might help your doctor make you better but can also screw you out of coverage when the bill comes"

That Sux, but if it can help doctors save lives than I'm all for it.

I presume (hope) that there is no cost for doctors to use this?

Offline scolaner  
#3 Posted : Sunday, February 10, 2013 9:20:14 AM(UTC)
scolaner


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 11/27/2012(UTC)
Posts: 234

You'd presume wrong, realneil. There is no information yet on pricing. However, if it works, it's probably more than worth the cost. Better efficiency (i.e. improved patient care and outcomes) and fewer mistakes (i.e., fewer chances for malpractice lawsuits) would be wonderful.

If it works.

Offline dorkstar  
#4 Posted : Monday, February 11, 2013 8:15:44 AM(UTC)
Dorkstar


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/16/2012(UTC)
Posts: 749
Location: Dallas, Tx

ER Visit : $2000

Medication : $500

Watson Fee : $10000

lol

Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.