Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your HotHardware Forums forum account, or Register a new forum account.
Interesting. I always told people that SSD's needed to be more reliable before they could replace HDD's but with this chart, it turns out that type of reliability may never be achieved; additionally, the fact that performance degrades as time goes on is also scary. It's no secret that every technology has a wall that'll be hit and when they hit that wall they'll either have to find a way to get through that wall or develop new technology if that wall can't be broken; to hear that flash's wall is going to be tough to break is disheartening due to the fact that SSD's have been hyped as the successor of HDD, the one that'd bring faster writes, faster reads and lower latency; while the read speeds will be more or less uneffected; the write speeds and the latency will take a major step backwards, the major drawing point of SSD's will be marginalized and soon there will barely be any difference between HDD's and SDD's as a whole.
I think what they need to do is find another storage method or work with what they have; it may mean starting from scratch or dealing with high prices but it's better then wondering whether or not the cheaper TLC will be able to be reliable enough without affecting the speeds. MLC and SLC may be expensive right now but from the charts above, it's better to keep those instead of trying to lower prices further through TLC; if anything it would help SSD's get by for at least a few years.