Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline paul  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:56:15 AM(UTC)
News


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 25,073

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
OCZ just made available new firmware that's supposed to fix a handful of stability issues with certain SandForce-based solid state drives (SSDs). Affected SSDs include the Vertex 3 series, Vertex 3 Max IOPS series, Agility 3 series, and Solid 3 series.

According to the release notes, the firmware addresses the following:
  • Fixed a rare condition that may cause Windows Blue Screen error when the primary-configured drive woke up from either a SATA slumber mode or S3/S4 modes.
  • Fixed a rare condition that may cause Windows Blue Screen error when the drive was configured as primary with OS installed.
  • Fixed a corner-case issue that may cause the drive to stutter or Windows freezing screen when a media read error occurred.
  • Further improved robustness of Secure Erase operation to prevent possible low-level data structure corruption.
  • Significantly improved TRIM handling to enhance system stability.

Anyone who has experienced a BSOD with one of the affected models is encouraged to upgrade the firmware. You should also keep an eye on your SSD's manufacturer's website for an update if you own a non-OCZ with a SandForce SF-2000 series chipset. Apparently the stability issues extend to all SF-2000 SSDs.

Offline OptimusPrimeTime  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:37:08 PM(UTC)
OptimusPrimeTime


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/4/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,050
Location: East Coast

"This is one of the things that scares me about having the OS installed on a SSD. But one day I'll make the transition, love the speeds, but Intel Smart R could be a more comfortable situation. There is also that Caching SSD from OCZ as well. Waiting for that review here."

Offline rapid1  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:03:46 PM(UTC)
rapid1


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/29/2008(UTC)
Posts: 4,851
United States

Run it like I do I have an OS SSD drive and 2 standard HD's behind it running in RAID 1 right now. I would rather have 3 running in RAID 5 for the added performance on the data drive side as well. The big thing is the OS runs on top of everything and everything therefore runs through the OS. So the performance increase is felt across the board. Especially with one of the SATA3 or even a PCI-E SSD (being that mine is neither and I can tell the difference) and there performance levels. So even if the SSD does go out you have a full back up on one of the standard HD's and lose no data.

Offline rapid1  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:06:41 PM(UTC)
rapid1


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/29/2008(UTC)
Posts: 4,851
United States

I don't know and SSD as an OS drive seems optimum to me really especially considering everything runs through the OS and will therefore gain from the added performance of the SSD. Just grab a couple standard HD's which are cheap as dirt and run them in raid for the performance gain there.

Offline AKwyn  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:39:55 PM(UTC)
AKwyn


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/18/2010(UTC)
Posts: 3,215
Man
Location: California

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)

Plus there is the whole "reliability" question and all. I mean if an SSD maker is willing to make an MLC SSD that has the lifespan of an SLC SSD then I might put my OS on my SSD full-time. As it is, I choose reliability over speed.

Offline OptimusPrimeTime  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 3:37:14 PM(UTC)
OptimusPrimeTime


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/4/2011(UTC)
Posts: 1,050
Location: East Coast

"Thanks, I know now who to seek for further advice if I would opt for the options you mentioned. "

Offline omegadraco  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 5:11:39 PM(UTC)
omegadraco


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/21/2011(UTC)
Posts: 2,827
Location: United States, Connecticut

Good going OCZ on fixing these problems.

Offline ThunderBird  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:49:44 PM(UTC)
ThunderBird


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/2/2011(UTC)
Posts: 460

Good news if more people are to jump on board the SSD train.

Offline Inspector  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:55:33 PM(UTC)
Inspector


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 1/28/2010(UTC)
Posts: 3,749
Man
Location: New York

Done :)

Offline realneil  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, October 18, 2011 7:51:59 PM(UTC)
realneil


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Moderator, Registered
Joined: 4/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8,695
Man
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

Thanks: 2 times

  I have one of these drives, but there has never been an issue with it.

i'll flash it anyway.

Offline dvsman  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:29:46 AM(UTC)
dvsman


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/24/2011(UTC)
Posts: 4
Location: Washington, DC

SSD reliability I don't think is even an issue anymore - outside of firmware bugs by the manufacturer. Once you get passed initial setup - have everything up and running - it should be all good.

I've run Samsung PM800s (3 x256gb of them) in both single and raid configurations as boot drive. Never a problem. While they weren't the fastest of their generation, they were the best bang for the buck. Now I'm testing out a latest generation Crucial M4 and it is amazingly fast. Faster than two of my 1st Gen Samsungs in RAID 0 and for less money. If you are worried about long term reliability - do like I have done - run a standard SATA HD in parallel and keep all your important data on that (or offload it to a NAS).

It only takes a couple of minutes to reinstall windows on an SSD so I don't even mind having to blank and reinstall the OS anymore - since I normally do it so many times anyway (such as when changing mobos or other major bits of hardware).

Offline gazd1  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, October 19, 2011 7:50:21 AM(UTC)
gazd1


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/13/2011(UTC)
Posts: 218

I'm glad that I stalled for some reason when it came to buying an OCZ SSD. I think that I'll wait a little longer & get the OCZ Vertex with the updated firmware.

Offline gloriad1  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, October 19, 2011 8:03:08 AM(UTC)
gloriad1


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/25/2011(UTC)
Posts: 96

Here to! I'm glad that I'm a slow adopter of new tech, even though it is not that new the SSD's that is. I still use the good old HDD's and will for some time to come.

Offline realneil  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, October 19, 2011 2:33:40 PM(UTC)
realneil


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Moderator, Registered
Joined: 4/8/2009(UTC)
Posts: 8,695
Man
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia

Thanks: 2 times

dvsman wrote:
If you are worried about long term reliability - do like I have done - run a standard SATA HD in parallel and keep all your important data on that

I keep an extra WD Black 1TB drive in all of my computers for data storage. I've been buying 1.5TB Seagate drives over the past few months and I'm almost ready to get a NAS box for them. I need space for 6 drives.

As to reliability, SSD's are working without problems for me here. I have one SATA-II and two SATA-III drives so far. I just flashed the OCZ Solid SATA-III drive without any problems. The time to hesitate buying into SSD's is over. Get what you can afford to get and use them. They are awesome.

Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.