Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline raze304  
#1 Posted : Monday, August 1, 2005 2:24:00 PM(UTC)
raze304


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/30/2004(UTC)
Posts: 75
Location: United States, Wisconsin

Ok. I made a thread about what difference would running winXP Pro vs. WinXP home make on a rig. BUT, after doin some digging and some thinking, I was wondering. Hyperthreading is supposed to EMULATE a 2nd physical processor on your system. Well, Winxp HOME does NOT support dual proc setups. BUT, PRO DOES. So, would that warrant any performance gain for a hyperthreaded p4 to run on win pro instead of home since pro has native dual proc support anyway??
Offline Ashton_Dad  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, August 2, 2005 9:27:26 AM(UTC)
Ashton_Dad


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/24/2005(UTC)
Posts: 94
Location: U.S.Minor Outlying Islands, Massachusetts

where did you read that HOME does not support dual processors?
Offline avakin  
#3 Posted : Sunday, April 2, 2006 5:49:48 PM(UTC)
avakin


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/30/2006(UTC)
Posts: 11
Location: United States, Massachusetts

I didn't know that... but it would make sense since pro is twice the price of home, or it used to be. I never understood the benefits of pro, but i have it.
Offline charIie  
#4 Posted : Thursday, June 15, 2006 5:07:46 AM(UTC)
charIie


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/15/2006(UTC)
Posts: 250
Location: United States, Pennsylvania

I have pro and a p4 3.0 which shows up as two processors in task mgr. In general pro will be more benificial. Probably run smoother and little things that were missed on home.
Offline Drago  
#5 Posted : Friday, June 16, 2006 11:40:52 AM(UTC)
Drago


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/22/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,610
Location: United States, Texas

well i sure can tell who has done their homework on this. XP Pro is xp home with better networking support and tools. Other than that they are the same. The only reason to get pro would be if you are on a corperate network where the networking features would be benificial. For the average joe, xp home is just fine.
Offline Lou784  
#6 Posted : Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:41:46 AM(UTC)
Lou784


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/14/2005(UTC)
Posts: 90
Location: Springfield, Illinois

Actually it is correct that XP Home only supports a single processor and XP PRO can support dual core processors. I've seen this topic come up several times on forums and I've seen people say both are exactly the same OS, only one has more networking features and remote desktop ability. If you disagree with me then you can go visit Microsoft's website and look at the difference your self or visit this link to the website that shows the difference between XP Home and PRO:

XP Home & XP PRO

So the 2 main benefits in XP PRO are the multi-processor support. Windows XP Pro supports up to two microprocessors, while Home Edition supports only one. And the various networking and remote desktop abilties that XP home does not have.

And as for HTT, I am pretty sure XP Home works just fine with it since it really is not considered 2 actual micro processor's, but 1 real one and 1 "virutal one".
Offline dorogar  
#7 Posted : Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:49:27 PM(UTC)
dorogar


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/11/2006(UTC)
Posts: 169
Location: Armenia, Other

You want to say that AMD X2 wont work normally with XP home (if I am geting you right).
Offline Elsparrow  
#8 Posted : Saturday, June 17, 2006 2:27:53 PM(UTC)
Elsparrow


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 9/26/2004(UTC)
Posts: 5,063
Location: United Kingdom, Other

Surely you are confusing dual core with dual CPU?

An X2 is a dual core single CPU system.

An Opteron server is an example of a dual CPU system, with 2 individual chips in their own socket.
Offline Drago  
#9 Posted : Saturday, June 17, 2006 3:25:16 PM(UTC)
Drago


Rank: Advanced Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/22/2004(UTC)
Posts: 3,610
Location: United States, Texas

Lou that link is from before xp was released so the info on that page is partially specualtion at best

If you want info about xp go to the people that made it, not a third party.

The only mention of processor support is that of like elsp is saying, dual cpu boards that are really only found in very high end workstations and servers. It mentions nothing of not supporting dual cores, and i know that xp home works and recognizes dual cores and the virtual core on the P4 with HT enabled in the bios.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/howtobuy/choosing2.mspx
Offline SilverVenom57  
#10 Posted : Monday, June 19, 2006 1:17:00 PM(UTC)
SilverVenom57


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/10/2005(UTC)
Posts: 753
Location: United States, Virginia

Pro has a bunch of extra networking features and some tigher security features on the higher levels...and of course support for more CPUs, these are physical CPUs, not including dual core & hyper-threading...
Offline Freeman  
#11 Posted : Monday, June 19, 2006 2:22:09 PM(UTC)
Freeman


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 11/24/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,363
Location: Toronto, Canada

quote:

Originally posted by: SilverVenom57
Pro has a bunch of extra networking features and some tigher security features on the higher levels...and of course support for more CPUs, these are physical CPUs, not including dual core & hyper-threading...


exactly, pro supports two physical cpus, dual core and hyper threading are different. my p4 with hyperthreading shows as two procs in task manager in xp home, so i know this to be the case.
Offline rapid1  
#12 Posted : Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:13:06 AM(UTC)
rapid1


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/29/2008(UTC)
Posts: 4,851
United States

The actual difference in XP pro and HOME is actually the backbone of the operating system. XP home is based loosely on WIN98 SE as the backbone, whereas XP pro is based on and almost is WIN2000 with multimedia and other added benefits pertaining mainly to multimedia and networking. SO as far as performance goes XP pro would be my choice however I am running VISTA 64 Ultimate now I was actually part of XP beta (and VISTA Beta). XP PRO and HOME have different memory paths and recognition as well as Virtual capabilities which in a home PC environment would probably effect you only if you had 4 gigs of ram and in page file performance capability. Most of this would however be kind of inconsequential in many scenarios but the ones it does influence are at least beneficial in PRO.

Offline nelsoncp21  
#13 Posted : Sunday, May 18, 2008 11:26:15 AM(UTC)
nelsoncp21


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 5/18/2005(UTC)
Posts: 2,923
Location: United States, Virginia

wow this was a really old thread!

Offline ice_73  
#14 Posted : Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:21:30 PM(UTC)
ice_73


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 2/14/2005(UTC)
Posts: 1,351
Location: new york city

nelsoncp21 wrote:

wow this was a really old thread!



werd, rapid1, please do not bring up old threads unless there is a need a too do so.
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.