Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline News  
#1 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 11:56:16 AM(UTC)
News


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/23/2007(UTC)
Posts: 25,073

Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 3 post(s)
When Sony bought the Gaikai streaming service and announced it was building custom PlayStation 3 boards to drop into servers for its PlayStation Now game service, a lot of folks got excited by the potential. This type of service delivery could mark the future of gaming, make backwards compatibility a non-issue, and in the long run, completely transform the console business.  Over the long run, a game console might function more as a media and control hub than a standalone rendering machine -- and Sony seemed to have their finger on the idea much more firmly than Microsoft, which was off chasing Kinect and offering vague statements about cloud rendering.

Unfortunately, this is Sony we're talking about -- the company has a long-standing history of combining great technology and questionable use policies. Kotaku recently took the PlayStation Now beta for a test drive, and what they report back points to far more problems than the usual performance issues -- the game prices are nuts. Want to play Final Fantasy XIII-2 for four hours? That's $4.99.  Want to play it for three months? That'll be $30 please.



Deus Ex: Human Revolution is $4.99 for four hours, $29.99 for 90 days. Let's compare that to GameFly, where you can rent one game per month at $15.96 or two games for $23. Alternately, you can just buy Deus Ex: HR for $14.95. Alternately, and far more sensibly, you can just buy the game for PC or last-gen console for between $8 and $15 depending on your choice of venue. By any standard, renting a game for 30 days for the same price you'd pay to purchase it outright is a lousy deal.  

But then, this raises the interesting question of whether GameFly and it's equivalent services are particularly good deals and I suspect the question depends on just how quickly you finish games and how long you want to keep them around. If you're playing 4 games a month, GameFly is a great deal. If you're playing one game a month, especially if it's an older title, buying it outright may be the better option. Then again, you have the option to explicitly do that with Gamefly, whereas PlayStation Now doesn't currently offer any such function.

There are games with lower prices, but even there Sony is slamming into the same problem. You can buy Guacamelee on PC for $14.99, or rent it for 90 days for $14.99. Sony's basically charging purchase price for indie games and older titles,  and it's not going to sit well with fans. It's also making beta users pay for the privilege of testing something, when the entire point of testing a beta service, typically, is that you don't pay for it -- unless you're the kind of neurotic hyper-invasive yuppie who thinks paying $1500 for a face computer and calling yourself a Google Glass "Explorer" actually represents a service to mankind and not an invitation to be thrown out of every business in town.

Glassholes aside, the overwhelming majority of people aren't willing to pay for a service that, by all accounts, isn't working very well at the moment. Reports from almost every tester boil down to "Interesting, but way too laggy to rely on" right now. Paying $4.99 for a four-hour play session is bad, paying $4.99 for jerky, stuttering game performance is intolerable.

Sony says that they're experimenting with a variety of pricing models and that they intend to offer some kind of monthly service plan alongside or on top of per-game pricing and I sincerely hope that's true. A monthly PS Now subscription with full access to a robust back catalog could be a great value-add for PlayStation, but not if it's going to come with sky-high pricing and terrible performance.
Offline ScottMcAbee  
#2 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 1:27:08 PM(UTC)
ScottMcAbee


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/21/2014(UTC)
Posts: 2

And this is why I promptly quit using the ps now beta!

Offline OOs  
#3 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 1:48:31 PM(UTC)
OOs


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/22/2011(UTC)
Posts: 38

-_- maybe because they are broke and need some money every way they can.

Offline semitope  
#4 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 2:08:00 PM(UTC)
semitope


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/28/2012(UTC)
Posts: 52

the 4.99 one is the only one that looks bad. They've got prices to sort out but I dont see this as outrageous. Kinda what you'd expect from a fancy service. This isn't the same as renting a physical copy of a game that gamefly doesn't need to put up servers or anything else for.

Offline epiqpwnage  
#5 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 4:00:25 PM(UTC)
epiqpwnage


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/21/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1

Why rent when you can buy digital/physical copy for more or less the same price? PS Now is cloud based meaning your game experience depends on the internet connection and of course the stability and speed of their streaming servers. One of those two fail (or perform poorly) and you won't be able to play your expensive 'rented' games. And as it stands, the performance is not worth the price...and that's what makes it outrageous

Offline RWilliams  
#6 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 4:05:47 PM(UTC)
RWilliams


Rank: Administration

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 9/5/2012(UTC)
Posts: 644
Location: Canada

Renting a game for more than what it costs... amazing.

Offline OfficialPCMasterrace  
#7 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 7:31:01 PM(UTC)
OfficialPCMasterrace


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 4/18/2014(UTC)
Posts: 2

This is what happens when you let con artists take over the game industry.

Offline JustinJohnson  
#8 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 9:13:17 PM(UTC)
JustinJohnson


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/25/2013(UTC)
Posts: 12
Location: Canada

well lol i can buy the game for pc (directors cut) for 5 bucks right now... i bought the game on sale for 2.99 last year and now have the option to upgrade which im surely gonna do soon

Offline NickRefriKing  
#9 Posted : Saturday, June 21, 2014 11:50:48 PM(UTC)
NickRefriKing


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/25/2014(UTC)
Posts: 12

They said they're still working on the price models so this isn't really news.

Offline Joel H  
#10 Posted : Sunday, June 22, 2014 9:50:13 AM(UTC)
Joel H


Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Administrators, Registered
Joined: 7/16/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,089

Of course it is. Charging people to use a beta service is a crock. Charging people far too much money for a beta is a double crock.

Users browsing this topic



Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.