lol, I am old. I love games like Diablo, even though I heard the new Diablo is nothing like the original Diablo. I like what they did with the music of the first 2 Diablos and how they set the environments in them. I don't really think they make games like that anymore to much extent really. I might have to check out the Elder Scrolls though to see what the whole thing looks like.

You'd like the current Diablo 3 game if you enjoyed the first 2 games and their expansions, only negative about it is it needs to be online to activate (though you don't need to allow others into your single player games). The classic loot system and upgrades are all in the game with lots of cool unique items for you to find.

You'd like the current Diablo 3 game if you enjoyed the first 2 games and their expansions, only negative about it is it needs to be online to activate (though you don't need to allow others into your single player games). The classic loot system and upgrades are all in the game with lots of cool unique items for you to find.

Single player games should be between the game and the player with the exception of patches and DLCs.

I do like the idea of Steam, and I understand that companies have to make sure you have a legal copy, but once you do that, they should not force you to be online or even log in to play.

Isn't Office now a yearly subscription too? Circling back to the original post, ESO is a B2P (buy to play) game. It used to be subscription based, then moved to just buy the game and you can play. You can still subscribe for extra benefits, but I did not want to pay monthly. Sometimes I only play a few hours a month. Now I get what I pay for which is all most people really want I think.