quote:
Originally posted by: Covert_One24
perosnally i think sony goes for more of a flashy look to attract customers into buying there more expensive product. but really that product is the same as something of a lower price range
That's a complete generalisation. Did you actually read some reviews on it and do some reasearch first?
Whilst I'm against those people that stick to Sony products, thinking if they do they're guranteed the best every time (idiots), to instantly discount them as a potential best in class for the reasoning above is folly.
My current digicam is a Sony DSC-W1 and, believe me, I wouldn't have bought it unless it was the best in its class, which it was at the time. It was very close between it and a Canon - it always is in the budget camera areena. In fact, Sony have winners at all levels andf have the top digital camcorders too.
Of the two above I'd go for the Canon as it has
slightly better performance, but performance is the be-all and end-all for me though. If you find the Sony cheaper, more attractive or if it's lighter or smaller then that could be the clincher for you, personally.
EDIT: The Canon is slightly smaller while the Sony is a little lighter. Both look fantastic IMO.
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/sd600.html
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/w50.html
It's a crap looking website but don't let that put you off, the guy really knows his stuff. Both of these cams are in his recommended list.